- Australia loses wechat account election looms serial number#
- Australia loses wechat account election looms full#
We use the same venues election after election, so the cost of this is justified by the magnitude of the task these venues perform. We believe video surveillance and alarms with a check on “arm” and “disarm” times should be the absolute minimum requirement for a secure pre-poll or regional counting centre. If no suitable response is received, please let us know via contact us. If you have any information that proves otherwise, this can be provided to the AEC here. Q6: The AEC’s rigorous chain-of-custody mechanisms are open to abuse, as the last pre-poll supervisor out of the building can simply double back and load up his private car with sealed ballot boxes.Ī6: One Nation has not received any proof this is happening. One Nation supports secure, point-to-point transport in a vehicle with video and GPS surveillance to remove any chance of ballot substitution. If no suitable response is received, please let us know via contact us,Īs a general discussion though – can ballot boxes go astray and ballots be substituted? Theoretically this is possible given that ballot boxes are not securely transported and the quality of the seals is an issue. One Nation has not received any proof such rigging is happening. Indeed, the closer the electorate the more effective the scrutineer system becomes. There is no evidence of a major variance capable of affecting a House of Reps or Senate outcome. What if the ballots were swapped for different ballots on the kitchen table of an activist employee’s home when the pre-poll closed for the night? That is still a rigged election, isn’t it?Ī5: The initial count is compared back to the final count by the AEC and party scrutineers. Q5: Auditing means the count is undertaken at least twice and is done by different counting teams. Secure transport should be used and this secure transport should include time logs and surveillance cameras on the cargo, with point-to-point transit. Transport of ballots in private vehicles is allowed by the legislation, but it is our view that it should not be happening. Anyone with specific information to prove otherwise are invited to contact our office via contact us There should only be one number per box and numbers should only be used once. Why are they getting away with this?Ī4: Zip-tie numbers are logged and, we are told, reconciled.
Australia loses wechat account election looms serial number#
Q4: An AEC supervisor was seen with a bundle of ballot-box sealing zip-ties all with the same serial number and was seen taking ballot boxes home from the pre-poll. Why is this not addressed?Ī3: It would be unlikely that the booth Supervisor was the only experienced person there, however any specific examples of this should be reported to the AEC here. Supervisors are seen chatting outside polling stations leaving temp staff unsupervised. Q3: AEC supervisors leave temporary election workers without direct monitoring despite claims by the AEC that this does not occur. We do not believe the integrity issue is a staff-based one, rather the issue is in their systems and specifically the quality of the voter roll and security over ballots and electronic records during counting. In a booth of any significant size however, the AEC staff are most likely to keep each other honest because of those competing political sympathies.
Australia loses wechat account election looms full#
It is because the AEC refuse to answer in a full and honest manner that there is a lack of confidence in their operation.
Is election integrity being assessed on a staff basis?Ī2: The behaviour of the AEC over the three years my team has been scrutinising their operations is anything BUT open and transparent. Surely this can only be true if all staff are honest, which in the present highly charged political environment is unlikely. Q2: The AEC claims its processes are open and transparent. This is not ideal but it renders such fraud pointless, which is why little actual proof exists of such things occurring. This means one party may influence a booth in one location, whereas an opposing party will do the same elsewhere. (b) Activist involvement is compensatory. (a) The ability to make a significant change in results is limited by AEC procedures. Is it possible that political activists can work their way into responsible positions in the AEC to interfere with ballot box content?Ī1: This is true, however the degree by which this affects the result is likely to be small, if at all, for two reasons: Q1: The count for elections and referendums is undertaken by over 100,000+ temporary election workers.
0 kommentar(er)
